Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Actipulse Neuroscience Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Actipulse Neuroscience Inc. is currently managing 2 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These 2 actions are being reviewed by 2 distinct examiners, indicating that each pending matter has a separate point of contact. However, both actions are concentrated within 1 distinct art unit. The busiest examiner for the portfolio is MARMOR II, CHARLES ALAN, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. This examiner handles 1 of the company's 2 pending office actions.

The concentration of 2 pending actions in 1 art unit suggests a specific technical focus within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector. While the company receives feedback from 2 distinct examiners, the shared art unit environment may lead to some consistency in the technical standards applied to the 2 pending office actions. Practitioners should coordinate strategies to address the specific requirements of this 1 art unit while managing the individual styles of the 2 examiners. This structure allows the company to test its claims against 2 different perspectives within a single technical classification. The success of the 2 pending office actions will depend on navigating the 1 art unit's specific examination culture. This concentrated approach within 1 art unit requires a unified technical argument across both pending matters.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MARMOR II, CHARLES ALAN 1 12.6% +26.3%
TRAN, LARA LINH 1 16.7% +90.9%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18009151 ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE PREVENTION OR TREATMENT WITH LOW INTENSITY AND HIGH FREQUENCY MAGNETIC STIMULATION TRAN, LARA LINH 87d overdue
18561535 MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER OR PERSISTENT DEPRESSIVE DISORDER PREVENTION OR TREATMENT WITH LOW INTENSITY AND HIGH FREQUENCY MAGNETIC STIMULATION MARMOR II, CHARLES ALAN —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18009151 ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE PREVENTION OR TREATMENT WITH LOW INTENSITY AND HIGH FREQUENCY MAGNETIC STIMULATION TRAN, LARA LINH 87d overdue
18561535 MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER OR PERSISTENT DEPRESSIVE DISORDER PREVENTION OR TREATMENT WITH LOW INTENSITY AND HIGH FREQUENCY MAGNETIC STIMULATION MARMOR II, CHARLES ALAN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3791 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18561535 MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER OR PERSISTENT DEPRESSIVE DISORDER PREVENTION OR TREATMENT WITH LOW INTENSITY AND HIGH FREQUENCY MAGNETIC STIMULATION MARMOR II, CHARLES ALAN 3791 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 17, 2023
18009151 ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE PREVENTION OR TREATMENT WITH LOW INTENSITY AND HIGH FREQUENCY MAGNETIC STIMULATION TRAN, LARA LINH 3791 §102§103 Final Rejection 87d overdue Pending Dec 08, 2022

Managing Actipulse Neuroscience Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Actipulse Neuroscience Inc. have?

Actipulse Neuroscience Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Actipulse Neuroscience Inc. applications?

Charles Alan Marmor II has the most, with 1 of Actipulse Neuroscience Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Actipulse Neuroscience Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month