Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Activbody Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The portfolio's current prosecution activity is focused on this single matter. For the practitioner, this means that the prosecution effort is highly concentrated on one medical device application.
ANDERSON, MEGAN M is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, with 1 pending office action. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the prosecution is concentrated. This arrangement provides a clear point of contact for the pending medical device application. The practitioner can focus entirely on the feedback from ANDERSON, MEGAN M without the need to manage multiple examiner relationships. This centralized structure for the 1 pending office action allows for a direct and potentially more efficient resolution of the matter within the assigned art unit. The prosecution strategy can be specifically tailored to the examiner's established patterns in the mechanical engineering field.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANDERSON, MEGAN M | 1 | 75.0% | +27.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18402601 | METHOD AND DEVICES TO MEASURE PARAMETERS FOR BOXING PUNCHES OR PUSH ACTIONS | ANDERSON, MEGAN M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18402601 | METHOD AND DEVICES TO MEASURE PARAMETERS FOR BOXING PUNCHES OR PUSH ACTIONS | ANDERSON, MEGAN M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3784 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18402601 | METHOD AND DEVICES TO MEASURE PARAMETERS FOR BOXING PUNCHES OR PUSH ACTIONS | ANDERSON, MEGAN M | 3784 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 02, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialActivbody Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Megan M Anderson has the most, with 1 of Activbody Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
