Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Adaptivedge Readiness Technologies LLC has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. WALSH, EMMETT K is the busiest examiner for the company, responsible for 1 pending office action. This single action represents the entirety of the company's current active prosecution.
Because the workload is limited to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the company's strategy is highly focused. Practitioners should tailor their approach to the specific tendencies of WALSH, EMMETT K. The 1 pending office action indicates a very targeted patent filing in the transportation and mechanical systems sector. With only 1 art unit involved, the technical scope of the current prosecution is narrow. This centralized structure allows for a clear and direct path for the company's intellectual property goals. The company's current patent efforts are entirely dependent on the review of this single examiner within the specified art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WALSH, EMMETT K | 1 | 52.7% | +20.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19003863 | USER READINESS EVALUATION SYSTEM | WALSH, EMMETT K | 71d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19003863 | USER READINESS EVALUATION SYSTEM | WALSH, EMMETT K | 71d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3628 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19003863 | USER READINESS EVALUATION SYSTEM | WALSH, EMMETT K | 3628 | §101§102§103 | Final Rejection | 71d | Pending | Dec 27, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial