Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Add Technologies Ltd.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Add Technologies Ltd. manages a company patent portfolio within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The portfolio currently features 1 pending office action. This prosecution activity is conducted under 1 distinct examiner. Additionally, the 1 pending office action is situated within 1 distinct art unit. These data points indicate that the current patent strategy is focused on a specific technical niche at the USPTO. The concentration of the portfolio suggests that the technical subject matter is highly specific.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is BAZARGANI, ARYA AHMADI, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This count of 1 pending office action matches the total number of pending office actions for the portfolio. For a practitioner, this means that the prosecution progress is currently dependent on the decisions of BAZARGANI, ARYA AHMADI. The involvement of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the subject matter is specialized. Navigating the specific requirements of the 1 distinct examiner is the current task for the applicant.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BAZARGANI, ARYA AHMADI 1 62.5% +31.3%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
12998180 MULTIPARTICULATE TABLET AND METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF BAZARGANI, ARYA AHMADI —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1600 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
12998180 MULTIPARTICULATE TABLET AND METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF BAZARGANI, ARYA AHMADI 1600 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 24, 2011

Managing Add Technologies Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month