Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Adept Materials Inc.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Adept Materials Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This 1 action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The small scale of pending activity indicates a focused effort on a specific technological advancement. Practitioners should note that the 1 distinct art unit involved suggests a specialized focus within the chemistry and materials field. The concentration of the portfolio means that all current prosecution activity is limited to 1 point of contact within the patent office.

The busiest examiner is KARST, DAVID THOMAS, who is managing 1 pending office action. Because there is 1 pending office action in total, this 1 examiner is handling the company's current prosecution work. Practitioners can expect a focus on this 1 examiner's requirements for the company's active patent application. The outcome of this 1 case will define the company's current patent status in this technology area. This centralization allows for a targeted approach to prosecution, as all efforts are directed toward satisfying the requirements of KARST, DAVID THOMAS. Building a clear record with this 1 examiner is the primary task for the company's current prosecution efforts.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KARST, DAVID THOMAS 1 64.7% +9.8%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19537011 Coating Compositions, Films, And Methods KARST, DAVID THOMAS —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1767 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19537011 Coating Compositions, Films, And Methods KARST, DAVID THOMAS 1767 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 11, 2026

Managing Adept Materials Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month