Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Adrianus Martinus Gerardus Theunisse holds a portfolio in the Communications technology area. There is currently 1 pending office action associated with this entity. This action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit. The portfolio's current activity is limited to a single point of contact at the patent office.
WILLIAM JOSEPH KLIMOWICZ is the busiest examiner for this portfolio. He is currently handling 1 pending office action. Because there is only 1 pending action in total, William Joseph Klimowicz manages the entirety of the company's current pending workload. This creates a direct relationship between the company and a single examiner in the Communications sector.
Practitioners can focus their attention entirely on the specific requirements and tendencies of this 1 distinct examiner. The fact that the busiest examiner pending count is 1 reflects the total volume of pending actions for the portfolio. With only 1 distinct art unit involved, the prosecution environment is highly concentrated. This allows for a deep dive into the specific standards of that unit without the need to navigate multiple administrative groups.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KLIMOWICZ, WILLIAM JOSEPH | 1 | 80.8% | +18.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19261358 | METHOD FOR PRODUCING GRAMOPHONE RECORDS BY INJECTION MOULDING | KLIMOWICZ, WILLIAM JOSEPH | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19261358 | METHOD FOR PRODUCING GRAMOPHONE RECORDS BY INJECTION MOULDING | KLIMOWICZ, WILLIAM JOSEPH | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2688 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19261358 | METHOD FOR PRODUCING GRAMOPHONE RECORDS BY INJECTION MOULDING | KLIMOWICZ, WILLIAM JOSEPH | 2688 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 07, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialAdrianus Martinus Gerardus Theunisse has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
William Joseph Klimowicz has the most, with 1 of Adrianus Martinus Gerardus Theunisse's pending office actions.
Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
