Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Adtheorent Inc. manages a company patent portfolio within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio currently features 1 pending office action. This prosecution activity is conducted under 1 distinct examiner. Additionally, the 1 pending office action is situated within 1 distinct art unit. These data points indicate that the current patent strategy is focused on a specific technical niche at the USPTO. The concentration of the portfolio suggests that the technical subject matter is highly specific.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is DURAN, ARTHUR D, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This count of 1 pending office action matches the total number of pending office actions for the portfolio. For a practitioner, this means that the prosecution progress is currently dependent on the decisions of DURAN, ARTHUR D. The involvement of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the subject matter is specialized. Navigating the specific requirements of the 1 distinct examiner is the current task for the applicant.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DURAN, ARTHUR D | 1 | 15.8% | +23.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13797873 | REAL-TIME BIDDING DATA MONITORING AND AGGREGATION APPARATUSES, METHODS AND SYSTEMS | DURAN, ARTHUR D | 38d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13797873 | REAL-TIME BIDDING DATA MONITORING AND AGGREGATION APPARATUSES, METHODS AND SYSTEMS | DURAN, ARTHUR D | 38d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3622 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13797873 | REAL-TIME BIDDING DATA MONITORING AND AGGREGATION APPARATUSES, METHODS AND SYSTEMS | DURAN, ARTHUR D | 3622 | §101§102§103 | Final Rejection | 38d overdue | Pending | Mar 12, 2013 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial