Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Adultimum AG currently has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, ROBITAILLE, JOHN P, who holds the 1 busiest examiner pending action. The prosecution is currently confined to 1 distinct art unit, indicating a singular focus for the company's pending matter. The 1 pending office action represents the total current workload for the company at the USPTO.
Because ROBITAILLE, JOHN P is the only examiner involved, the outcome of the prosecution depends on his specific review of the Chemistry & Materials claims. The 1 distinct art unit involved suggests that the company is not currently managing matters across multiple technical divisions, allowing for a focused and direct response strategy. Practitioners should tailor their arguments to the specific examination patterns of the 1 distinct examiner. This concentrated environment allows for an efficient resolution of the 1 busiest examiner pending action within the Chemistry & Materials sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROBITAILLE, JOHN P | 1 | 62.6% | +22.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17761470 | METHOD OF FORMING A DEVICE OF COMPOSITE MATERIAL, A PATTERN, A DEVICE | ROBITAILLE, JOHN P | 6d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17761470 | METHOD OF FORMING A DEVICE OF COMPOSITE MATERIAL, A PATTERN, A DEVICE | ROBITAILLE, JOHN P | 6d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1743 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17761470 | METHOD OF FORMING A DEVICE OF COMPOSITE MATERIAL, A PATTERN, A DEVICE | ROBITAILLE, JOHN P | 1743 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 6d | Pending | Mar 17, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial