Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Advanced Institute Of Convergence Technology

1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

The Advanced Institute Of Convergence Technology currently faces 1 pending office action. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiners, concentrating the active prosecution under one individual. SREEVATSA, SREEYA is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action.

Because there is only a pending office action, SREEVATSA, SREEYA handles the current workload. This centralized prosecution under the distinct examiners defines the communication requirements for the institute. The focus on the busiest examiner pending action ensures that all current legal responses are directed to SREEVATSA, SREEYA.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
100% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SREEVATSA, SREEYA 1 86.1% +3.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19001651 EXTERNAL MAGNETIZATION SYSTEM USING MULTIPLE SOLENOID MODULES WITH HALBACH ARRAY AND OPERATION METHOD THEREFOR SREEVATSA, SREEYA —

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19001651 EXTERNAL MAGNETIZATION SYSTEM USING MULTIPLE SOLENOID MODULES WITH HALBACH ARRAY AND OPERATION METHOD THEREFOR SREEVATSA, SREEYA — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 26, 2024

Managing Advanced Institute Of Convergence Technology's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month