Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Advanced Neuromodulation Systems Inc.

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

8 pending office actions • 7 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 26 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Advanced Neuromodulation Systems Inc. has 8 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are distributed among 8 distinct examiners. The portfolio spans 7 distinct art units. REYES, REGINALD R is the busiest examiner and is responsible for 1 pending office action. The one-to-one ratio of 8 pending office actions to 8 distinct examiners means that no examiner is handling more than one case.

The 7 distinct art units indicate a high degree of technical variety within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector. Practitioners must be prepared for 8 different examination styles across these 7 distinct art units. REYES, REGINALD R handles 1 of the 8 pending office actions. This broad distribution suggests that the company's innovations touch on many different sub-specialties. Each of the 8 distinct examiners will offer a unique perspective on the claims.

The 7 distinct art units require the prosecution team to be familiar with the specific guidelines of many different groups. With 8 pending office actions, the company must manage a diverse set of deadlines and procedural requirements. The Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area is the central theme of the portfolio. The lack of concentration among the 8 distinct examiners means that successful strategies in one case may not be applicable to others.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
2
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (38%)
3
Medium (38%)
1
Easy (12%)
1
Unknown (12%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (12%)
§103 only3 (38%)
Double-patenting only1 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (25%)
No statute on record1 (12%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
12% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
7
Mechanical / Eng
88% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
REYES, REGINALD R 1 40.9% +31.5%
VAHDAT, KHADIJEH A 1 79.6% +20.0%
CHEN, FRANK S 1 82.3% +8.4%
EVANISKO, GEORGE ROBERT 1 70.4% +34.9%
GEDEON, BRIAN T 1 87.0% +7.2%
ILAGAN, VINCENT CAESAR 1 52.2% +64.7%
LEE, ERICA SHENGKAI 1 65.4% +29.7%
HOFFPAUIR, ANDREW ELI 1 40.6% +50.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18642541 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATICALLY MODIFYING ONE OR MORE GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE (GUI) COMPONENTS OF AN IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE (IMD)-RELATED APPLICATION BY MONITORING AND ANALYZING PATIENT INTERACTION CHEN, FRANK S 35d overdue

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18919427 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MONITORING ELECTRODE TISSUE ENGAGEMENT DURING ABLATION VAHDAT, KHADIJEH A —
18631737 METHOD OF IMPLANTING A STIMULATION LEAD FOR DORSAL ROOT GANGLION STIMULATION AND RELATED IMPLANT TOOL EVANISKO, GEORGE ROBERT —
18540802 IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE (IMD) WITH CODE PATH METRICS ILAGAN, VINCENT CAESAR —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17891105 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING DIGITAL HEALTH SERVICES HOFFPAUIR, ANDREW ELI 27d
19245083 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING DIGITAL HEALTH SERVICES REYES, REGINALD R —
18919427 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MONITORING ELECTRODE TISSUE ENGAGEMENT DURING ABLATION VAHDAT, KHADIJEH A —
18631737 METHOD OF IMPLANTING A STIMULATION LEAD FOR DORSAL ROOT GANGLION STIMULATION AND RELATED IMPLANT TOOL EVANISKO, GEORGE ROBERT —
18540802 IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE (IMD) WITH CODE PATH METRICS ILAGAN, VINCENT CAESAR —
18125696 SPINAL CORD STIMULATION TO TREAT PAIN LEE, ERICA SHENGKAI —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3796 2
3683 1
3794 1
2611 1
3792 1
3686 1
3791 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19245083 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING DIGITAL HEALTH SERVICES REYES, REGINALD R 3683 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 20, 2025
18919427 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MONITORING ELECTRODE TISSUE ENGAGEMENT DURING ABLATION VAHDAT, KHADIJEH A 3794 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 18, 2024
18642541 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATICALLY MODIFYING ONE OR MORE GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE (GUI) COMPONENTS OF AN IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE (IMD)-RELATED APPLICATION BY MONITORING AND ANALYZING PATIENT INTERACTION CHEN, FRANK S 2611 §103 Non-Final OA 35d overdue Pending Apr 22, 2024
18631737 METHOD OF IMPLANTING A STIMULATION LEAD FOR DORSAL ROOT GANGLION STIMULATION AND RELATED IMPLANT TOOL EVANISKO, GEORGE ROBERT 3792 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 10, 2024
18609485 IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR WITH MULTIPLE STIMULATION ENGINES GEDEON, BRIAN T 3796 Other Final Rejection — Pending Mar 19, 2024
18540802 IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE (IMD) WITH CODE PATH METRICS ILAGAN, VINCENT CAESAR 3686 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 14, 2023
18125696 SPINAL CORD STIMULATION TO TREAT PAIN LEE, ERICA SHENGKAI 3796 §103Other Final Rejection — Pending Mar 23, 2023
17891105 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING DIGITAL HEALTH SERVICES HOFFPAUIR, ANDREW ELI 3791 §103 Final Rejection 27d Pending Aug 18, 2022

Managing Advanced Neuromodulation Systems Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Advanced Neuromodulation Systems Inc. have?

Advanced Neuromodulation Systems Inc. has 8 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 7 art units and 8 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Advanced Neuromodulation Systems Inc. applications?

Reginald R Reyes has the most, with 1 of Advanced Neuromodulation Systems Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Advanced Neuromodulation Systems Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month