Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Advanced Space LLC

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Advanced Space LLC has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 2 pending office actions are split between 2 distinct examiners, which provides the company with independent reviews for its active applications. The matters are also separated into 2 distinct art units, indicating administrative variety for a portfolio of this size.

The busiest examiner for the portfolio is HORNER, MINATO LEE, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since this busiest examiner only manages 1 of the 2 pending office actions, the current workload is evenly divided between the 2 distinct examiners. This distribution across 2 distinct art units means that the company's prosecution outcomes are not concentrated under a single examiner or administrative group. Practitioners should expect to navigate different examination styles within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
2
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HORNER, MINATO LEE 1 68.2% +4.8%
SCHOECH, ASHLEY TIFFANY 1 68.8% +28.1%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18925394 Incremental Neural Network Model Inference SCHOECH, ASHLEY TIFFANY 48d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3665 1
3669 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18932120 Almanac of Neural Network Models HORNER, MINATO LEE 3665 §103 Final Rejection 34d Pending Oct 30, 2024
18925394 Incremental Neural Network Model Inference SCHOECH, ASHLEY TIFFANY 3669 §103 Final Rejection 48d Pending Oct 24, 2024

Managing Advanced Space LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month