Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Advanced Technology & Materials Co. Ltd. shows 2 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This distribution indicates that the company's current prosecution efforts are spread across different technical groups within the USPTO rather than being centralized.
DIEGO JESUS NG is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action. Given that there are 2 pending office actions in total, the workload is split among the 2 distinct examiners. Each examiner is responsible for exactly one matter, which may lead to different prosecution timelines or outcomes depending on individual examiner behavior and the standards of the 2 distinct art units.
The presence of multiple art units suggests that the pending office actions involve different technical sub-specialties within the broader Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field. Practitioners should be prepared to navigate the specific requirements of each unit. The fact that the busiest examiner, DIEGO JESUS NG, only handles 1 pending office action confirms that no single examiner dominates the company's current portfolio activity.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NG, DIEGO JESUS | 1 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
| KRUPICKA, ADAM C | 1 | 62.1% | +27.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18925565 | A Lightweight Combined Type Grinding Wheel | NG, DIEGO JESUS | — |
| 18250553 | AMORPHOUS NANOCRYSTALLINE ALLOY STRIP AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME | KRUPICKA, ADAM C | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18250553 | AMORPHOUS NANOCRYSTALLINE ALLOY STRIP AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME | KRUPICKA, ADAM C | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3723 | 1 |
| 1784 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18925565 | A Lightweight Combined Type Grinding Wheel | NG, DIEGO JESUS | 3723 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 24, 2024 |
| 18250553 | AMORPHOUS NANOCRYSTALLINE ALLOY STRIP AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME | KRUPICKA, ADAM C | 1784 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 26, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialAdvanced Technology & Materials Co. Ltd. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Diego Jesus Ng has the most, with 1 of Advanced Technology & Materials Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
