Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Adventech LLC currently has 1 pending office action in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. This activity is restricted to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a specific technical focus for the company's current patent applications, as all pending matters are concentrated in a technical domain. The presence of only 1 pending office action suggests a targeted approach to the company's intellectual property development.
BOUZIANE, SAID is the busiest examiner, managing 1 pending office action. With only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the company can tailor its responses to the specific examination patterns of this individual. Practitioners should analyze the examiner's previous decisions in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics field to better anticipate potential rejections. This centralized prosecution strategy allows for a more efficient use of resources, as there is only 1 set of examiner preferences to navigate. The focus on 1 art unit ensures that the technical arguments remain consistent throughout the prosecution process.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| No statute on record | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BOUZIANE, SAID | 1 | 77.0% | +10.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18656383 | Methods for Starting a Reverse Winding Electrical Motor | BOUZIANE, SAID | 8d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2846 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18656383 | Methods for Starting a Reverse Winding Electrical Motor | BOUZIANE, SAID | 2846 | — | Final Rejection | 8d | Pending | May 06, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial