Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Advinow Inc. operates within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company currently has 1 pending office action under review at the USPTO. This prosecution activity involves 1 distinct examiner, which indicates the examination process for the company's current filings. This concentration allows for a focus on the technical merits of the pending application during the prosecution phase.
The prosecution is situated within 1 distinct art unit, ensuring that the examination remains within an administrative group. SZUMNY, JONATHON A is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because this examiner is the 1 assigned to the portfolio, they are responsible for the entirety of the company's active office actions. This creates a point of contact for all current prosecution matters handled by the office.
Managing 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector suggests an intellectual property strategy. The use of 1 distinct art unit limits the complexity of the prosecution. This environment is for maintaining arguments and responses during the examination of the company's current patent efforts. Practitioners can focus their resources on the requirements of the 1 examiner involved in the case.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SZUMNY, JONATHON A | 1 | 57.4% | +57.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15863078 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED HEALTHCARE SERVICE | SZUMNY, JONATHON A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15863078 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED HEALTHCARE SERVICE | SZUMNY, JONATHON A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3686 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15863078 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED HEALTHCARE SERVICE | SZUMNY, JONATHON A | 3686 | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 05, 2018 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial