Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Aeonus Co. Ltd. is active in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio contains 1 pending office action. This prosecution activity is managed by 1 distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. JACOB, WILLIAM J is the busiest examiner, with 1 busiest examiner pending action.
As there is only 1 distinct examiner involved, the company's current patent strategy is highly concentrated. The 1 pending office action represents the entirety of the active workload within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector for this portfolio. Practitioners should tailor their responses to the specific preferences of JACOB, WILLIAM J to ensure an efficient prosecution cycle for this 1 pending matter. The reliance on 1 distinct art unit indicates a cohesive technical focus for the company's current filings. Success in this matter is crucial for establishing the company's intellectual property position within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems landscape.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JACOB, WILLIAM J | 1 | 49.0% | +34.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18249960 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MANAGING POWER OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION USING ESS | JACOB, WILLIAM J | 24d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18249960 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MANAGING POWER OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION USING ESS | JACOB, WILLIAM J | 24d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3696 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18249960 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MANAGING POWER OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION USING ESS | JACOB, WILLIAM J | 3696 | §101§102 | Final Rejection | 24d overdue | Pending | Apr 20, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial