Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Aerocompact Group Holding AG has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct art unit and is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner. The current prosecution activity is limited to this single pending action. This narrow focus suggests that the company is prioritizing a specific technical advancement within the Transportation sector.
KYLE WALRAED-SULLIVAN is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, managing the 1 pending office action. With only 1 distinct examiner involved in the 1 pending matter, the company's current patent office interactions are centralized. This allows for a focused response to the examiner's specific technical feedback. The applicant can work directly with KYLE WALRAED-SULLIVAN to resolve any issues, benefiting from the simplicity of having only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved in the process.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE | 1 | 73.3% | +30.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18811497 | RACKING-SYSTEM FOR FLAT PANELS | WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE | 10d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18811497 | RACKING-SYSTEM FOR FLAT PANELS | WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE | 10d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3635 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18811497 | RACKING-SYSTEM FOR FLAT PANELS | WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE | 3635 | §102§103§112Other | Final Rejection | 10d overdue | Pending | Aug 21, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial