Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Aerotec Power Pty Ltd maintains a patent portfolio within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The current prosecution activity is limited to 1 pending office action. This workload is handled by 1 distinct examiner operating within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a very focused examination path for the company's current filings.
The examiner identified as the busiest for this portfolio is HUNTER, ALVIN A, who is assigned 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This single action represents the total volume of 1 pending office action for the entire portfolio. Such a concentrated distribution means that the outcome of the current prosecution cycle relies on the interactions within this specific art unit.
For a portfolio in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering, having only 1 distinct examiner suggests that the pending intellectual property is currently localized. The prosecution profile is defined by the 1 pending office action under HUNTER, ALVIN A, providing a clear but singular focus for the company's legal representatives during this period.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HUNTER, ALVIN A | 1 | 85.7% | +2.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17627865 | IMPROVED SPORTING ARTICLES | HUNTER, ALVIN A | 57d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3711 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17627865 | IMPROVED SPORTING ARTICLES | HUNTER, ALVIN A | 3711 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 57d | Pending | Jan 18, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial