Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Agency for Defense Development

Technology areas: Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

8 pending office actions • 7 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 39 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Agency for Defense Development has 9 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are distributed among 9 distinct examiners and 9 distinct art units. This one-to-one ratio indicates that each pending matter is being handled by a different examiner in a different art unit, reflecting a highly decentralized prosecution landscape for the agency's mechanical systems filings. This requires a unique strategy for each individual case.

ATMAKURI, VIKAS NMN is the busiest examiner, managing 1 pending office action. Since there are 9 pending actions in total, the workload is divided equally among the 9 distinct examiners. The agency must navigate nine separate prosecution paths, each with its own examiner and art unit. This distribution requires a broad management approach to handle the diverse requirements of 9 different examiners across the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector. No concentration of workload exists under a single examiner.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (50%)
4
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
3
Communications
38% of docket
1
Semiconductors
12% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LAWRENCE, JOHN CALEB 2 100.0% +0.0%
ATMAKURI, VIKAS NMN 1 46.9% +31.6%
ALAM, SALIM JOSEPH 1 0.0% +0.0%
TSAI, TSUNG YIN 1 81.6% +11.6%
PLUMB, NIGEL H 1 90.7% +1.1%
VAZQUEZ, ANA M 1 80.0% +17.7%
GONG, KRIS HANYU 1 25.0% +48.2%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18519495 LOW-PRESSURE BOILING COOLING SYSTEM VAZQUEZ, ANA M 17d overdue
18931482 METHOD FOR CHANGING TARGET SHOOTING CYCLE FOR RECONNAISSANCE OF TARGET AND APPARATUS FOR THE SAME TSAI, TSUNG YIN —
18610962 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING TOPOLOGY BASED ON RECOGNITION OF ORBITAL CHARACTERISTICS OF LOW EARTH ORBIT SATELLITE CONSTELLATION SYSTEM, AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING INSTRUCTIONS TO PERFORM METHOD FOR GENERATING TOPOLOGY LAWRENCE, JOHN CALEB —

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18598494 Electronic Apparatus for Jamming and Operation Method Thereof LAWRENCE, JOHN CALEB 22d
19077259 METHOD OF TRANSMITTING SIGNAL AND APPARATUS THEREOF ATMAKURI, VIKAS NMN —
18941329 COOLING INTAKE DUCT STRUCTURE WITH BULLETPROOF GRILL FOR MILITARY HYBRID VEHICLES ALAM, SALIM JOSEPH —
18760854 ZINC OXIDE SYNTHESIS TECHNOLOGY THAT SIMULTANEOUSLY PRODUCES UNIFORM GOLD NANOPARTICLE FORMATION AND SURFACE DEFECTS PLUMB, NIGEL H —
18145321 MOTION ASSIST APPARATUS GONG, KRIS HANYU —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18519495 LOW-PRESSURE BOILING COOLING SYSTEM VAZQUEZ, ANA M 17d overdue
19077259 METHOD OF TRANSMITTING SIGNAL AND APPARATUS THEREOF ATMAKURI, VIKAS NMN —
18931482 METHOD FOR CHANGING TARGET SHOOTING CYCLE FOR RECONNAISSANCE OF TARGET AND APPARATUS FOR THE SAME TSAI, TSUNG YIN —
18145321 MOTION ASSIST APPARATUS GONG, KRIS HANYU —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2646 2
3645 1
3612 1
2656 1
2855 1
3763 1
3785 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19077259 METHOD OF TRANSMITTING SIGNAL AND APPARATUS THEREOF ATMAKURI, VIKAS NMN 3645 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 12, 2025
18941329 COOLING INTAKE DUCT STRUCTURE WITH BULLETPROOF GRILL FOR MILITARY HYBRID VEHICLES ALAM, SALIM JOSEPH 3612 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 08, 2024
18931482 METHOD FOR CHANGING TARGET SHOOTING CYCLE FOR RECONNAISSANCE OF TARGET AND APPARATUS FOR THE SAME TSAI, TSUNG YIN 2656 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 30, 2024
18760854 ZINC OXIDE SYNTHESIS TECHNOLOGY THAT SIMULTANEOUSLY PRODUCES UNIFORM GOLD NANOPARTICLE FORMATION AND SURFACE DEFECTS PLUMB, NIGEL H 2855 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 01, 2024
18610962 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING TOPOLOGY BASED ON RECOGNITION OF ORBITAL CHARACTERISTICS OF LOW EARTH ORBIT SATELLITE CONSTELLATION SYSTEM, AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING INSTRUCTIONS TO PERFORM METHOD FOR GENERATING TOPOLOGY LAWRENCE, JOHN CALEB 2646 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 20, 2024
18598494 Electronic Apparatus for Jamming and Operation Method Thereof LAWRENCE, JOHN CALEB 2646 §102§103 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Mar 07, 2024
18519495 LOW-PRESSURE BOILING COOLING SYSTEM VAZQUEZ, ANA M 3763 §103 Non-Final OA 17d overdue Pending Nov 27, 2023
18145321 MOTION ASSIST APPARATUS GONG, KRIS HANYU 3785 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 22, 2022

Managing Agency for Defense Development's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Agency for Defense Development have?

Agency for Defense Development has 8 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 7 art units and 7 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Agency for Defense Development applications?

John Caleb Lawrence has the most, with 2 of Agency for Defense Development's pending office actions.

What technology area are Agency for Defense Development's patent applications in?

Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month