Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Aglaris Ltd.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Aglaris Ltd. is currently navigating 2 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These matters are distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, indicating a diverse examination environment. This spread across 2 distinct art units suggests that the company's innovations may touch upon different technical sub-specialties within the broader chemistry field.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is WRIGHT, PATRICIA KATHRYN, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because the 2 pending office actions are split between 2 distinct examiners, no single examiner handles all of the current workload. Practitioners should prepare for varied examiner styles given the ratio of pending actions to examiners.

This distribution across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units for the pending workload reflects a lack of concentration in the prosecution process. While this increases the variety of feedback from the USPTO, it also requires the applicant to manage different examiner-specific preferences simultaneously. The strategy in the Chemistry & Materials area must therefore be flexible enough to accommodate different interpretive approaches across these separate art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WRIGHT, PATRICIA KATHRYN 1 65.3% +42.6%
MARCHESCHI, MICHAEL A 1 20.0% +17.9%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17048485 CELL SEPARATION CHAMBER AND CELL SEPARATION SYSTEM AND METHOD MARCHESCHI, MICHAEL A —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17048766 DISPOSABLE CARTRIDGE COOPERATING WITH A PLATFORM IN A FLEXIBLE SYSTEM FOR HANDLING AND/OR MANIPULATING FLUIDS WRIGHT, PATRICIA KATHRYN —
17048485 CELL SEPARATION CHAMBER AND CELL SEPARATION SYSTEM AND METHOD MARCHESCHI, MICHAEL A —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1798 1
1796 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17048766 DISPOSABLE CARTRIDGE COOPERATING WITH A PLATFORM IN A FLEXIBLE SYSTEM FOR HANDLING AND/OR MANIPULATING FLUIDS WRIGHT, PATRICIA KATHRYN 1798 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 19, 2020
17048485 CELL SEPARATION CHAMBER AND CELL SEPARATION SYSTEM AND METHOD MARCHESCHI, MICHAEL A 1796 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 16, 2020

Managing Aglaris Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Aglaris Ltd. have?

Aglaris Ltd. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Aglaris Ltd. applications?

Patricia Kathryn Wright has the most, with 1 of Aglaris Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Aglaris Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month