Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Agrorobotica S R L holds a company patent portfolio in the Computing & Software technology area. Currently, the portfolio has 1 pending office action. This action represents the focus of the company's efforts to secure patent protection for its agricultural software technologies. The prosecution activity is limited to this outstanding matter.
The administrative oversight for this portfolio is provided by 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This suggests that the company's computing assets are being evaluated within the assigned technical framework. For practitioners, this means that the prosecution strategy must be tailored to the standards of this 1 distinct art unit. There is no diversification of examiner perspectives across the workload.
VANWORMER, SKYLAR K is the busiest examiner assigned to this portfolio, currently managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Since there is 1 pending office action in total, this examiner is the decision-maker for the company's active applications. Practitioners should focus on the technical concerns raised by VANWORMER, SKYLAR K in the Computing & Software field.
The presence of 1 distinct art unit ensures that the examination of the company's claims remains consistent. With 1 pending office action, the legal team can focus its resources on resolving this matter. This prosecution environment avoids the risk of conflicting requirements from different examiners.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| VANWORMER, SKYLAR K | 1 | 46.9% | +28.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17418930 | INSECT ATTACK RISK PREDICTION SYSTEM AND METHOD | VANWORMER, SKYLAR K | 71d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17418930 | INSECT ATTACK RISK PREDICTION SYSTEM AND METHOD | VANWORMER, SKYLAR K | 71d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2146 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17418930 | INSECT ATTACK RISK PREDICTION SYSTEM AND METHOD | VANWORMER, SKYLAR K | 2146 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | 71d overdue | Pending | Jun 28, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial