Technology area: Computing & Software
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
AI Inside Inc. is active in the Computing & Software technology area and currently has 2 pending office actions. This indicates a focused prosecution strategy aimed at securing patent rights for its software innovations. The 2 pending actions show that the company is in the process of addressing examiner concerns for two of its patent applications.
The company's prosecution efforts are distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This distribution means that each of the 2 pending office actions is being reviewed by a different person in a different section of the patent office. Having 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units requires the company to adapt to two different sets of examination styles and procedural norms. This decentralized approach to the 2 pending actions means that the outcome of one may not necessarily influence the other.
LEE, ADAM is the busiest examiner for AI Inside Inc., currently handling 1 pending office action. Since there are 2 pending office actions and 2 distinct examiners, LEE, ADAM is responsible for a portion of the company's current pending workload. The other pending action is managed by a different examiner. To succeed in its prosecution, AI Inside Inc. must carefully consider the specific feedback from LEE, ADAM while also managing the requirements of the other examiner and art unit involved in the Computing & Software area.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEE, ADAM | 1 | 83.8% | +61.5% |
| O'CONNOR-EMANUEL, LAWRENCE SCOTT | 1 | — | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18817406 | APPARATUS, MANAGEMENT SERVER, DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND METHOD | LEE, ADAM | — |
| 18808287 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, METHOD | O'CONNOR-EMANUEL, LAWRENCE SCOTT | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2198 | 1 |
| 2193 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18817406 | APPARATUS, MANAGEMENT SERVER, DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND METHOD | LEE, ADAM | 2198 | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 28, 2024 |
| 18808287 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, METHOD | O'CONNOR-EMANUEL, LAWRENCE SCOTT | 2193 | §101§102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 19, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialAI Inside Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Adam Lee has the most, with 1 of AI Inside Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
