2 pending office actions • 0 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
AI Inside Inc. has 1 pending office action currently under review. This matter is assigned to a distinct examiner, LEE, ADAM, who is responsible for the 1 busiest examiner pending action. The presence of 0 distinct art units suggests the application may not yet be fully classified within a standard art unit structure or is in a transitional phase of the examination process.
With only a particular examiner involved, the company's current prosecution efforts are concentrated on a particular point of contact. This examiner's specific feedback will dictate the immediate trajectory of the pending portfolio. Because there is only 1 pending office action, the company can dedicate its full attention to the requirements set forth by LEE, ADAM, without the complexity of managing multiple examiners or art units. The lack of 0 distinct art units classification at this stage may require close monitoring of the application's administrative status.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEE, ADAM | 1 | 84.1% | +61.0% |
| O'CONNOR-EMANUEL, LAWRENCE SCOTT | 1 | — | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18817406 | APPARATUS, MANAGEMENT SERVER, DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND METHOD | LEE, ADAM | — |
| 18808287 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, METHOD | O'CONNOR-EMANUEL, LAWRENCE SCOTT | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18817406 | APPARATUS, MANAGEMENT SERVER, DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND METHOD | LEE, ADAM | — | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 28, 2024 |
| 18808287 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, METHOD | O'CONNOR-EMANUEL, LAWRENCE SCOTT | — | §101§102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 19, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial