Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (20%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 4 (80%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BITOR, RENAE ALLYN | 1 | 84.6% | +28.6% |
| TORRES, JOSE | 1 | 82.0% | +12.0% |
| LIN, JESSICA YIFANG | 1 | 81.8% | -3.3% |
| BEE, ANDREW W. | 1 | 73.1% | +31.8% |
| NASHER, AHMED ABDULLALIM-M | 1 | 80.2% | +33.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18607351 | CONTEXT BASED DEFECT DETECTION | BEE, ANDREW W. | 30d overdue |
| 18593941 | Defect Detection Prediction with a Compact Set of Prediction Channels | NASHER, AHMED ABDULLALIM-M | 23d overdue |
| 18607322 | AUTOMATIC DETECTION OF VARIATION IN PRODUCTION PROCESS | TORRES, JOSE | 27d |
| 18776168 | GENERATION ON OK MODEL BY MULTIPLE CONCEPTS | BITOR, RENAE ALLYN | — |
| 18607381 | DEFECT PROBABILITY ESTIMATION BASED ON CONCEPTS INTERRELATIONS | LIN, JESSICA YIFANG | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18607351 | CONTEXT BASED DEFECT DETECTION | BEE, ANDREW W. | 30d overdue |
| 18593941 | Defect Detection Prediction with a Compact Set of Prediction Channels | NASHER, AHMED ABDULLALIM-M | 23d overdue |
| 18607322 | AUTOMATIC DETECTION OF VARIATION IN PRODUCTION PROCESS | TORRES, JOSE | 27d |
| 18776168 | GENERATION ON OK MODEL BY MULTIPLE CONCEPTS | BITOR, RENAE ALLYN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2663 | 1 |
| 2664 | 1 |
| 2668 | 1 |
| 2677 | 1 |
| 2675 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18776168 | GENERATION ON OK MODEL BY MULTIPLE CONCEPTS | BITOR, RENAE ALLYN | 2663 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 17, 2024 |
| 18607322 | AUTOMATIC DETECTION OF VARIATION IN PRODUCTION PROCESS | TORRES, JOSE | 2664 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 27d | Pending | Mar 15, 2024 |
| 18607381 | DEFECT PROBABILITY ESTIMATION BASED ON CONCEPTS INTERRELATIONS | LIN, JESSICA YIFANG | 2668 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 15, 2024 |
| 18607351 | CONTEXT BASED DEFECT DETECTION | BEE, ANDREW W. | 2677 | §101§102 | Non-Final OA | 30d overdue | Pending | Mar 15, 2024 |
| 18593941 | Defect Detection Prediction with a Compact Set of Prediction Channels | NASHER, AHMED ABDULLALIM-M | 2675 | §102§112 | Non-Final OA | 23d overdue | Pending | Mar 03, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial