Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
AiCAN Inc. currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These matters are handled by 2 distinct examiners, indicating that each case is being reviewed by a different individual. This distribution suggests that the company must navigate multiple examiner perspectives even with a small number of cases. The applicant should prepare for separate prosecution paths for each matter.
The portfolio is distributed across 2 distinct art units, which points to a specific technical focus for these filings. The busiest examiner is BROWN, LUIS A, who is responsible for 1 of the pending office actions. With the distinct examiners operating in the art units, the applicant must manage separate prosecution paths for each matter. Practitioners should focus on the specific requirements of the 2 distinct art units while managing the pending office actions assigned to the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (50%) |
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BROWN, LUIS A | 1 | 46.2% | +31.3% |
| SENSENIG, SHAUN D | 1 | 14.2% | +16.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19143376 | INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, PROGRAM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM FOR SUPPORTING CHILD WELFARE SERVICES | BROWN, LUIS A | 8d |
| 19143377 | INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, PROGRAM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM FOR SUPPORTING CHILD WELFARE SERVICES | SENSENIG, SHAUN D | 29d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19143376 | INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, PROGRAM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM FOR SUPPORTING CHILD WELFARE SERVICES | BROWN, LUIS A | 8d |
| 19143377 | INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, PROGRAM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM FOR SUPPORTING CHILD WELFARE SERVICES | SENSENIG, SHAUN D | 29d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3626 | 1 |
| 3629 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19143376 | INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, PROGRAM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM FOR SUPPORTING CHILD WELFARE SERVICES | BROWN, LUIS A | 3626 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 8d | Pending | Jun 26, 2025 |
| 19143377 | INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, PROGRAM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM FOR SUPPORTING CHILD WELFARE SERVICES | SENSENIG, SHAUN D | 3629 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 29d | Pending | Jun 26, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial