Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Aillis Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Aillis Inc. is currently navigating 3 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct examiners, indicating that each examiner is handling exactly one active matter. This one-to-one ratio suggests a broad distribution of the portfolio's current legal challenges across different individuals at the patent office.

The portfolio spans 2 distinct art units, which implies that the company's innovations touch upon multiple specialized technical classifications. BOICE, JAMES EDWARD is identified as the busiest examiner, though he is responsible for only 1 pending action. This parity among the 3 distinct examiners means that no single individual currently holds a disproportionate influence over the portfolio's immediate outcomes.

Practitioners should note that the 3 pending office actions are not concentrated in a single art unit, as the data shows 2 distinct art units are involved. This dispersion requires monitoring different examination styles and art unit trends simultaneously. The involvement of BOICE, JAMES EDWARD as the busiest examiner with 1 pending action highlights the current low density of the workload per examiner.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (33%)
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BOICE, JAMES EDWARD 1 75.7% +9.9%
DINH, ANH-KHOA N 1 87.4% +15.2%
HUYNH, AN SON PHI 1 53.9% +45.6%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18643098 Processing Device, Processing Program, And Processing Method DINH, ANH-KHOA N 11d overdue
17771536 IMAGE CAPTURING DEVICE AND IMAGE CAPTURING SYSTEM HUYNH, AN SON PHI 22d

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18643098 Processing Device, Processing Program, And Processing Method DINH, ANH-KHOA N 11d overdue
17771536 IMAGE CAPTURING DEVICE AND IMAGE CAPTURING SYSTEM HUYNH, AN SON PHI 22d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3795 2
3796 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18823997 Assistance Tool, Imaging Device, Program, And Method BOICE, JAMES EDWARD 3795 §103 Final Rejection 28d Pending Sep 04, 2024
18643098 Processing Device, Processing Program, And Processing Method DINH, ANH-KHOA N 3796 §101 Final Rejection 11d overdue Pending Apr 23, 2024
17771536 IMAGE CAPTURING DEVICE AND IMAGE CAPTURING SYSTEM HUYNH, AN SON PHI 3795 §103§112 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Apr 25, 2022

Managing Aillis Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month