Technology areas: Computing & Software • Communications
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Aimotive Kft has 2 pending office actions in the Computing & Software technology area. These 2 pending office actions reflect the company's current efforts to protect its software-based innovations. The focus on Computing & Software indicates that the company is active in a highly technical and rapidly evolving field. Practitioners should prepare for the specific examination standards common in this technology area.
The 2 pending office actions are split across 2 distinct art units and 2 distinct examiners. This structure indicates that each pending matter is being examined independently by a different examiner in a different art unit. There is no centralization in the examination process for these 2 pending office actions, requiring a tailored approach for each. The involvement of 2 distinct art units suggests that the company's technology is recognized across different specialized groups.
ABAD, FARLEY J is the busiest examiner, responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. This represents a portion of the 2 total pending office actions in the portfolio. Since each of the 2 distinct examiners holds exactly 1 action, the workload is evenly balanced. Practitioners must coordinate across 2 distinct art units and 2 distinct examiners to manage the current 2 pending office actions.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| §112 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABAD, FARLEY J | 1 | 86.3% | +5.3% |
| SUMMERS, GEOFFREY E | 1 | 71.5% | +35.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18836962 | DYNAMIC BUFFERS AND METHOD FOR DYNAMIC BUFFER ALLOCATION | ABAD, FARLEY J | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18016495 | Method, Data Processing System, Computer Program Product And Computer Readable Medium For Object Segmentation | SUMMERS, GEOFFREY E | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2181 | 1 |
| 2669 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18836962 | DYNAMIC BUFFERS AND METHOD FOR DYNAMIC BUFFER ALLOCATION | ABAD, FARLEY J | 2181 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 08, 2024 |
| 18016495 | Method, Data Processing System, Computer Program Product And Computer Readable Medium For Object Segmentation | SUMMERS, GEOFFREY E | 2669 | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 17, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialAimotive Kft has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Farley J Abad has the most, with 1 of Aimotive Kft's pending office actions.
Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
