Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Airlines Reporting Corporation

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Airlines Reporting Corporation currently has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are being reviewed by 2 distinct examiners, which introduces multiple perspectives into the prosecution of the company's mechanical and e-commerce innovations. Despite the involvement of multiple examiners, the activity is contained within 1 distinct art unit, suggesting a consistent technical focus for the pending applications.

The workload is evenly split, with the busiest examiner, SINGH, RUPANGINI, managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since there are a matching number of distinct examiners for the 2 pending office actions, each examiner is responsible for an equal portion of the current pending volume. The concentration in 1 distinct art unit allows for a unified approach to the technical standards of that specific group, even while navigating the individual tendencies of different examiners. This structure suggests that while the technical field is narrow, the company must still address the subjective requirements of multiple examiners.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (50%)
§101 + other1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SINGH, RUPANGINI 1 35.2% +52.2%
GOODMAN, MATTHEW PARKER 1 20.2% +30.3%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17478082 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR A UNIVERSAL CONNECT CORPORATE TRAVEL MANAGEMENT PLATFORM GOODMAN, MATTHEW PARKER 48d
18649048 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PREDICTING DEMAND AT AN AIRLINE LEVEL FOR PROCURING ACCURATE NUMBER AND TYPE OF VEHICLES SINGH, RUPANGINI —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17478082 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR A UNIVERSAL CONNECT CORPORATE TRAVEL MANAGEMENT PLATFORM GOODMAN, MATTHEW PARKER 48d
18649048 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PREDICTING DEMAND AT AN AIRLINE LEVEL FOR PROCURING ACCURATE NUMBER AND TYPE OF VEHICLES SINGH, RUPANGINI —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3628 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18649048 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PREDICTING DEMAND AT AN AIRLINE LEVEL FOR PROCURING ACCURATE NUMBER AND TYPE OF VEHICLES SINGH, RUPANGINI 3628 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 29, 2024
17478082 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR A UNIVERSAL CONNECT CORPORATE TRAVEL MANAGEMENT PLATFORM GOODMAN, MATTHEW PARKER 3628 §101§103 Final Rejection 48d Pending Sep 17, 2021

Managing Airlines Reporting Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Airlines Reporting Corporation have?

Airlines Reporting Corporation has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Airlines Reporting Corporation applications?

Rupangini Singh has the most, with 1 of Airlines Reporting Corporation's pending office actions.

What technology area are Airlines Reporting Corporation's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month