Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Airsolve LLC

1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Airsolve LLC currently has 1 pending office action being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner. The portfolio data indicates 0 distinct art units associated with this activity, which suggests the matter may be in a specific administrative or preliminary state. This single action represents the entirety of the company's current prosecution efforts.

The busiest examiner for the portfolio is DIETZ, NOE ROBERT, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because this examiner is handling the only active case, the company's immediate patent strategy is tied to this single point of contact. Practitioners must focus on the specific preferences of this examiner to move the 1 pending office action toward a final disposition. The lack of other active matters means there are no alternative examiners to provide comparative insights.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
100% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DIETZ, NOE ROBERT 1 0.0% +0.0%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18595348 AEROSOL CONTAINMENT APPARATUS, SYSTEMS AND METHODS DIETZ, NOE ROBERT —

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18595348 AEROSOL CONTAINMENT APPARATUS, SYSTEMS AND METHODS DIETZ, NOE ROBERT — §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 04, 2024

Managing Airsolve LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month