Technology area: Computing & Software
5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Aising Ltd. is currently managing 5 pending office actions in the Computing & Software technology area. The data shows that 5 distinct examiners are involved in reviewing these cases, indicating a broad distribution of the company's intellectual property across different personnel. Furthermore, the workload is spread across 5 distinct art units, which suggests that the technical scope of the applications is quite diverse within the Computing & Software sector.
KWON, JUN is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, with 1 busiest examiner pending action currently assigned. Since there are 5 pending office actions in total and 5 distinct examiners, each examiner is responsible for only 1 case. This lack of examiner concentration means that the company must navigate 5 separate prosecution paths without the benefit of a single primary examiner.
For practitioners, the involvement of 5 distinct art units and 5 distinct examiners implies that there is no central point of influence in the current portfolio. The strategy for Aising Ltd. must be highly adaptable to the various standards of the 5 distinct art units. Success will depend on managing the 5 pending office actions individually, as the 1 busiest examiner pending action under KWON, JUN represents only a small portion of the total activity.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 3 (60%) |
| §103 only | 1 (20%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (20%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KWON, JUN | 1 | 42.0% | +43.4% |
| TRIEU, EM N | 1 | 45.9% | +14.3% |
| BARRETT, RYAN S | 1 | 65.6% | +40.9% |
| ALI, NAYMUR RAHMAN | 1 | 0.0% | +0.0% |
| HAN, JOSEP | 1 | 48.1% | +11.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18034981 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, PROGRAM, AND SYSTEM | ALI, NAYMUR RAHMAN | 9d |
| 18625467 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, PROGRAM, AND SYSTEM | KWON, JUN | — |
| 18694184 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, PROGRAM, AND SYSTEM | TRIEU, EM N | — |
| 18371843 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, METHOD, AND PROGRAM | BARRETT, RYAN S | — |
| 17925864 | CONTROL DEVICE, METHOD, AND PROGRAM | HAN, JOSEP | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18625467 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, PROGRAM, AND SYSTEM | KWON, JUN | — |
| 18694184 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, PROGRAM, AND SYSTEM | TRIEU, EM N | — |
| 18371843 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, METHOD, AND PROGRAM | BARRETT, RYAN S | — |
| 17925864 | CONTROL DEVICE, METHOD, AND PROGRAM | HAN, JOSEP | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2127 | 1 |
| 2128 | 1 |
| 2148 | 1 |
| 2123 | 1 |
| 2122 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18625467 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, PROGRAM, AND SYSTEM | KWON, JUN | 2127 | §101§102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 03, 2024 |
| 18694184 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, PROGRAM, AND SYSTEM | TRIEU, EM N | 2128 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 21, 2024 |
| 18371843 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, METHOD, AND PROGRAM | BARRETT, RYAN S | 2148 | §101§102§103§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 22, 2023 |
| 18034981 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, PROGRAM, AND SYSTEM | ALI, NAYMUR RAHMAN | 2123 | §103 | Final Rejection | 9d | Pending | May 02, 2023 |
| 17925864 | CONTROL DEVICE, METHOD, AND PROGRAM | HAN, JOSEP | 2122 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 17, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialAising Ltd. has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 5 art units and 5 examiners.
Jun Kwon has the most, with 1 of Aising Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
