Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Al Tice Labs S A

Technology area: Communications

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Al Tice Labs S A currently faces 1 pending office action within the Communications technology area. This prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner and is localized within 1 distinct art unit. Such a concentrated profile suggests that the company's current patent efforts are focused on a specific technological advancement or a single filing within the communications sector. The use of only 1 distinct art unit implies that the technical subject matter is being evaluated within a single specialized framework at the patent office.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is MOTSINGER, TANYA THERESA NGO, who is handling 1 pending office action. Because this single examiner manages the only pending action, the prosecution path is entirely dependent on the feedback and standards of this individual. The involvement of only 1 distinct art unit indicates that the subject matter has not branched out into multiple examination categories at this time. This allows for a streamlined communication strategy, as the company only needs to address the concerns of the examiner and the single technical division.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
100% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MOTSINGER, TANYA THERESA NGO 1 76.1% +14.6%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18724554 METHOD FOR VALIDATING AN AS-BUILT FTTH NETWORK MOTSINGER, TANYA THERESA NGO —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18724554 METHOD FOR VALIDATING AN AS-BUILT FTTH NETWORK MOTSINGER, TANYA THERESA NGO —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2635 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18724554 METHOD FOR VALIDATING AN AS-BUILT FTTH NETWORK MOTSINGER, TANYA THERESA NGO 2635 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 26, 2024

Managing Al Tice Labs S A's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month