Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Al Tice Labs S A currently faces 1 pending office action within the Communications technology area. This prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner and is localized within 1 distinct art unit. Such a concentrated profile suggests that the company's current patent efforts are focused on a specific technological advancement or a single filing within the communications sector. The use of only 1 distinct art unit implies that the technical subject matter is being evaluated within a single specialized framework at the patent office.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is MOTSINGER, TANYA THERESA NGO, who is handling 1 pending office action. Because this single examiner manages the only pending action, the prosecution path is entirely dependent on the feedback and standards of this individual. The involvement of only 1 distinct art unit indicates that the subject matter has not branched out into multiple examination categories at this time. This allows for a streamlined communication strategy, as the company only needs to address the concerns of the examiner and the single technical division.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MOTSINGER, TANYA THERESA NGO | 1 | 76.1% | +14.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18724554 | METHOD FOR VALIDATING AN AS-BUILT FTTH NETWORK | MOTSINGER, TANYA THERESA NGO | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18724554 | METHOD FOR VALIDATING AN AS-BUILT FTTH NETWORK | MOTSINGER, TANYA THERESA NGO | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2635 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18724554 | METHOD FOR VALIDATING AN AS-BUILT FTTH NETWORK | MOTSINGER, TANYA THERESA NGO | 2635 | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 26, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial