Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Albiti Inc. maintains a focused patent prosecution profile in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The portfolio currently shows 1 pending office action, which is being handled by 1 examiner, MACHNESS, ARIELLA. This concentrated activity occurs within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a highly specific point of engagement with the patent office. Such a narrow focus in both examiner assignment and art unit placement suggests that the company's current legal efforts are centered on a very particular technological niche within the chemistry sector.
Because MACHNESS, ARIELLA is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action, the total company pending workload rests with this individual. This alignment across 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit suggests a streamlined prosecution path for the current application, where the outcome is heavily dependent on the interpretations of a single official. Practitioners can monitor this specific interaction to gauge the progress of the company's intellectual property strategy in this technical sector. The lack of broader distribution across other examiners or art units at this time highlights the focused nature of the company's current pending matters.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MACHNESS, ARIELLA | 1 | 61.9% | +28.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18603502 | MANUFACTURING METHOD OF MICRONEEDLE BIOSENSOR | MACHNESS, ARIELLA | 23d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18603502 | MANUFACTURING METHOD OF MICRONEEDLE BIOSENSOR | MACHNESS, ARIELLA | 23d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1743 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18603502 | MANUFACTURING METHOD OF MICRONEEDLE BIOSENSOR | MACHNESS, ARIELLA | 1743 | §103§112Other | Non-Final OA | 23d | Pending | Mar 13, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial