Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Alcediag

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Alcediag is active in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area with a focused set of patent filings. The portfolio currently reports 1 pending office action, which suggests a narrow area of technical inquiry for the pending application. This work is handled by 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a localized prosecution effort that avoids the complexity of multi-examiner portfolios.

The busiest examiner for the portfolio is OLJUSKIN, TIMUR YURYEVICH, who is managing 1 pending office action. Because the portfolio involves only 1 distinct examiner, the progress of the company's pending intellectual property depends on the review process of this individual. Practitioners should tailor their responses to the specific scientific standards favored by OLJUSKIN, TIMUR YURYEVICH.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WISE, OLIVIA M. 1 33.9% +29.9%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17774752 DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF BIPOLAR DISORDER AND UNIPOLAR DEPRESSION BY BLOOD RNA EDITING BIOMARKERS WISE, OLIVIA M. —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17774752 DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF BIPOLAR DISORDER AND UNIPOLAR DEPRESSION BY BLOOD RNA EDITING BIOMARKERS WISE, OLIVIA M. —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1685 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17774752 DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF BIPOLAR DISORDER AND UNIPOLAR DEPRESSION BY BLOOD RNA EDITING BIOMARKERS WISE, OLIVIA M. 1685 §101§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 05, 2022

Managing Alcediag's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month