Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Alchemy Logic Systems Inc. maintains a company patent portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. There are 2 pending office actions currently active, and these are handled by 2 distinct examiners. This arrangement means that each of the 2 pending office actions is under the review of a unique official. The prosecution is split between 2 distinct art units, which suggests that the company's inventions cover different mechanical or system-based classifications.
The busiest examiner identified is WEBB, JESSICA MARIE, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. With 2 distinct examiners each handling 1 of the 2 pending office actions, the workload is evenly divided. The involvement of 2 distinct art units indicates that each of the 2 pending office actions is subject to the standards of a different technical group. Practitioners should prepare for separate examination tracks, as the 2 distinct examiners in 2 distinct art units will likely have different requirements for the Alchemy Logic Systems Inc. applications. This diversification requires careful management to ensure consistent results.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEWLON, WILLIAM D | 1 | 46.6% | +28.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18971679 | METHOD OF AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING A CONFIDENCE MEASUREMENT IN THE IMPAIRMENT RATING PROCESS | NEWLON, WILLIAM D | 58d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18971679 | METHOD OF AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING A CONFIDENCE MEASUREMENT IN THE IMPAIRMENT RATING PROCESS | NEWLON, WILLIAM D | 58d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3696 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18971679 | METHOD OF AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING A CONFIDENCE MEASUREMENT IN THE IMPAIRMENT RATING PROCESS | NEWLON, WILLIAM D | 3696 | §101Other | Final Rejection | 58d overdue | Pending | Dec 06, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial