Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Alecson Feld Australia Pty Ltd has 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single matter is being reviewed by a distinct examiner in a distinct art unit. The narrow scope of this prosecution activity suggests a highly focused entry into the mechanical systems and e-commerce space, where the applicant is prioritizing a specific technological advancement.
GILLS, KURTIS is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, holding 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because this individual is the only examiner currently engaged with the company's filings, the prosecution outcome depends entirely on their specific evaluation and interpretation of the claims. The concentration within an art unit ensures that the examination remains within a specific technical framework for transportation and mechanical systems, allowing the applicant to tailor their arguments to a consistent set of departmental standards.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GILLS, KURTIS | 1 | 57.9% | +29.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18643647 | MANAGING TECHNICAL PROCESS DATA | GILLS, KURTIS | 168d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18643647 | MANAGING TECHNICAL PROCESS DATA | GILLS, KURTIS | 168d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3624 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18643647 | MANAGING TECHNICAL PROCESS DATA | GILLS, KURTIS | 3624 | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 168d overdue | Pending | Apr 23, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial