Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Alera Medtech Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is assigned to OSINSKI, BRADLEY JAMES, who is the 1 examiner and the busiest examiner with 1 pending file. The prosecution is localized in 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a focused technical review. For a practitioner, the concentration of 1 pending office action under 1 examiner means that the immediate prosecution strategy is singular.
There is no need to coordinate across different art units or examiner styles. OSINSKI, BRADLEY JAMES, as the busiest examiner with 1 pending action, handles the entirety of the company's current USPTO workload. Practitioners should focus on establishing a clear dialogue with OSINSKI, BRADLEY JAMES to resolve the outstanding action efficiently. This streamlined prosecution profile indicates that the company's current USPTO activity is limited to a specific technical niche within the broader Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field. The administrative overhead is minimal given the low volume of pending matters, allowing for a dedicated focus on the 1 distinct art unit involved.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| OSINSKI, BRADLEY JAMES | 1 | 78.5% | +10.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18812194 | SECURING MEDICAL TUBING | OSINSKI, BRADLEY JAMES | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18812194 | SECURING MEDICAL TUBING | OSINSKI, BRADLEY JAMES | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3783 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18812194 | SECURING MEDICAL TUBING | OSINSKI, BRADLEY JAMES | 3783 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 22, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialAlera Medtech Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Bradley James Osinski has the most, with 1 of Alera Medtech Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
