Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Aliseo GmbH currently manages 2 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These 2 actions are split between 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This distribution indicates that each pending matter is being handled independently by different personnel. The presence of 2 pending actions shows a small but distributed set of filings in the medical and mechanical fields.
The busiest examiner, HUYNH, BRYANT KHIEM, has 1 pending office action, sharing the workload with one other examiner. With 2 pending office actions across 2 distinct art units, the company must manage two separate prosecution tracks. This decentralized structure requires the legal team to adapt to the specific examination styles of 2 distinct examiners. Practitioners should monitor the 2 distinct art units for differing procedural requirements that may impact the 2 pending office actions currently active.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HUYNH, BRYANT KHIEM | 1 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
| SWARTZ, JEREMY SCOTT | 1 | 96.7% | +3.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35522555 | Soap dispenser | SWARTZ, JEREMY SCOTT | 147d overdue |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18976531 | SOLID SOAP DISPENSER | HUYNH, BRYANT KHIEM | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3754 | 1 |
| 2931 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18976531 | SOLID SOAP DISPENSER | HUYNH, BRYANT KHIEM | 3754 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 11, 2024 |
| 35522555 | Soap dispenser | SWARTZ, JEREMY SCOTT | 2931 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 147d overdue | Pending | Jun 03, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialAliseo GmbH has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Bryant Khiem Huynh has the most, with 1 of Aliseo GmbH's pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
