Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
2 pending office actions • 0 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Allegion Access Technologies LLC has 2 pending office actions currently in progress. These actions are distributed among 2 distinct examiners, meaning each examiner is responsible for a single case. This arrangement requires the company to address the specific feedback and examination styles of two different individuals. The small number of 2 pending office actions suggests a very targeted approach to its current patent applications.
AGUDELO, PAOLA is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action, which is consistent with the overall distribution of the company's 2 pending matters. With 2 pending office actions and 2 distinct examiners, the company's current prosecution profile is decentralized. This suggests that the company must manage separate examiner relationships for each of its active cases.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Double-patenting only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AGUDELO, PAOLA | 1 | 76.9% | +17.2% |
| NGUYEN, CHI Q | 1 | 82.4% | +12.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19000122 | AUTOMATIC DOOR WITH RADAR SENSING | NGUYEN, CHI Q | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19069929 | CONNECTION SYSTEM FOR A HEADER AND A JAMB OF A DOOR ASSEMBLY | AGUDELO, PAOLA | — |
| 19000122 | AUTOMATIC DOOR WITH RADAR SENSING | NGUYEN, CHI Q | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19069929 | CONNECTION SYSTEM FOR A HEADER AND A JAMB OF A DOOR ASSEMBLY | AGUDELO, PAOLA | — | §103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 04, 2025 |
| 19000122 | AUTOMATIC DOOR WITH RADAR SENSING | NGUYEN, CHI Q | — | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 23, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial