Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Allure Medical Spa PLLC is engaged in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The company's portfolio currently has 1 pending office action, which is assigned to 1 distinct examiner. This reflects a very focused interaction with the patent office regarding their medical treatment methods.
The prosecution is being conducted in 1 distinct art unit. CREWS, JARET JAMES is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This 1 action is the only pending matter currently reported. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the company's prosecution strategy is concentrated on 1 point of review. The 1 pending office action is the only current obstacle to potential patent grants in the biotechnology sector. Practitioners should focus on the specific feedback from this 1 distinct examiner to move the application toward allowance and secure the spa's intellectual property assets.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CREWS, JARET JAMES | 1 | 44.7% | +70.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18142198 | COMPOSITION AND METHODS FOR GENERATING A DERMAL FILLER | CREWS, JARET JAMES | 26d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1691 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18142198 | COMPOSITION AND METHODS FOR GENERATING A DERMAL FILLER | CREWS, JARET JAMES | 1691 | §103 | Final Rejection | 26d overdue | Pending | May 02, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial