Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Allwinner Technology Co. Ltd. currently has 1 pending office action in the Computing & Software technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This shows a narrow scope of active prosecution for the company's software filings. For a practitioner, this concentration means that the outcome of the entire pending portfolio rests on a single examiner's interpretation of the prior art and patentability requirements in the computing field.
TRAN, AMY NMN is the busiest examiner, overseeing 1 pending office action. The involvement of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit indicates that the computing and software work is being evaluated by a single specialized group. Practitioners should focus on the specific examination style of this individual, as there are no other examiners currently providing feedback on the company's applications. This centralized review process simplifies administrative tracking but increases the strategic importance of every interaction with the assigned examiner.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRAN, AMY NMN | 1 | 38.2% | +37.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18281891 | MEMORY ALLOCATION METHOD FOR AI PROCESSOR, COMPUTER APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | TRAN, AMY NMN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18281891 | MEMORY ALLOCATION METHOD FOR AI PROCESSOR, COMPUTER APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | TRAN, AMY NMN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2126 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18281891 | MEMORY ALLOCATION METHOD FOR AI PROCESSOR, COMPUTER APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | TRAN, AMY NMN | 2126 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 13, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial