Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 22 patents granted in the last 365 days
Alpha Networks Inc. currently manages 4 pending office actions in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These actions are assigned to 4 distinct examiners across 3 distinct art units. This distribution indicates that each of the 4 pending office actions is being reviewed by a different individual.
The busiest examiner is PUENTES, DANIEL CALRISSIAN, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because there are 4 distinct examiners for 4 pending office actions, no single examiner has a concentrated workload for the company. The involvement of 3 distinct art units suggests that the 4 pending office actions are spread across several technical sub-specialties. Practitioners must be prepared to navigate the specific standards of 3 distinct art units while addressing the individual styles of 4 distinct examiners. This variety in examination oversight for only 4 pending office actions requires a flexible and individualized prosecution strategy to account for the 4 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units involved.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (25%) |
| §103 only | 1 (25%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUENTES, DANIEL CALRISSIAN | 1 | 88.7% | +3.1% |
| PERVIN, NUZHAT | 1 | 81.3% | +13.5% |
| LEVI, DAMEON E | 1 | 64.8% | +1.8% |
| HENSON, BRANDON JAMES | 1 | 65.2% | +28.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18085876 | TARGET DETECTION METHOD, TARGET DETECTION DEVICE, AND MILLIMETER WAVE RADAR SYSTEM | HENSON, BRANDON JAMES | 8d overdue |
| 19279218 | SOFT STARTER AND SYSTEM MAINBOARD WITH SOFT-START FUNCTION | PUENTES, DANIEL CALRISSIAN | — |
| 18945028 | METHOD FOR REDUCING COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY IN DETERMINING DIRECTION OF ARRIVAL FOR RADAR SYSTEM, AND RADAR SYSTEM IMPLEMENTING THE SAME | PERVIN, NUZHAT | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18085876 | TARGET DETECTION METHOD, TARGET DETECTION DEVICE, AND MILLIMETER WAVE RADAR SYSTEM | HENSON, BRANDON JAMES | 8d overdue |
| 18945028 | METHOD FOR REDUCING COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY IN DETERMINING DIRECTION OF ARRIVAL FOR RADAR SYSTEM, AND RADAR SYSTEM IMPLEMENTING THE SAME | PERVIN, NUZHAT | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3648 | 2 |
| 2836 | 1 |
| 2845 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19279218 | SOFT STARTER AND SYSTEM MAINBOARD WITH SOFT-START FUNCTION | PUENTES, DANIEL CALRISSIAN | 2836 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 24, 2025 |
| 18945028 | METHOD FOR REDUCING COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY IN DETERMINING DIRECTION OF ARRIVAL FOR RADAR SYSTEM, AND RADAR SYSTEM IMPLEMENTING THE SAME | PERVIN, NUZHAT | 3648 | §101§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 12, 2024 |
| 18810358 | MAGNETO-ELECTRIC DIPOLE ANTENNA AND ANTENNA ARRAY USING THE SAME | LEVI, DAMEON E | 2845 | §103 | Final Rejection | 20d | Pending | Aug 20, 2024 |
| 18085876 | TARGET DETECTION METHOD, TARGET DETECTION DEVICE, AND MILLIMETER WAVE RADAR SYSTEM | HENSON, BRANDON JAMES | 3648 | §103§112Other | Non-Final OA | 8d overdue | Pending | Dec 21, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialAlpha Networks Inc. has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 4 examiners.
Daniel Calrissian Puentes has the most, with 1 of Alpha Networks Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics (USPTO Tech Center 2800), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
