Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Alternative Gene Expression S L has 1 pending office action currently active in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The prosecution is localized, involving 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, which simplifies the administrative oversight required for their current patent filings. This concentration indicates that the company is not currently facing the complexity of multi-front prosecution across different USPTO departments.
Examiner ALGHAILANI, SHADA MOHAMED is identified as the busiest examiner, holding 1 pending office action. For the practitioner, this means the immediate strategy for the portfolio is centered on a single set of examiner preferences and art unit guidelines. Understanding the specific nuances of this examiner's approach to the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field is essential for a successful outcome.
With only 1 distinct art unit involved, the company can dedicate its resources to a singular legal argument. The 1 pending office action serves as the primary hurdle for the applicant, and its resolution will define the current success of the company's intellectual property efforts in this specific technology sector. The streamlined nature of this 1 distinct examiner's involvement allows for a more direct and efficient communication process during prosecution.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALGHAILANI, SHADA MOHAMED | 1 | 34.8% | +45.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17632980 | INSECT REARING BOX | ALGHAILANI, SHADA MOHAMED | 10d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3643 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17632980 | INSECT REARING BOX | ALGHAILANI, SHADA MOHAMED | 3643 | §103 | Final Rejection | 10d overdue | Pending | Feb 04, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial