Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Altr Solutions Inc. has 2 pending office actions focused within the Computing & Software technology area. Both of these actions are being processed within 1 distinct art unit, which suggests a concentrated area of technical focus for the company's current patent applications. This concentration may allow for a more consistent application of legal standards across their pending matters. The portfolio involves 2 distinct examiners, meaning each pending action is being handled by a different individual.
VAISHALI SHAH is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. Because each examiner handles a single case, the company faces a variety of individual perspectives even within 1 art unit. The presence of 2 examiners for the pending actions indicates that the workload is fully distributed across the available personnel. Practitioners should leverage the commonality of the art unit while tailoring their arguments to the specific preferences of the different examiners involved.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHAH, VAISHALI | 1 | 57.4% | +53.2% |
| WRIGHT, BRYAN F | 1 | 78.2% | +24.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19184069 | COMMUNICATING FINE-GRAINED APPLICATION DATABASE ACCESS TO A THIRD-PARTY AGENT | SHAH, VAISHALI | 4d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19184069 | COMMUNICATING FINE-GRAINED APPLICATION DATABASE ACCESS TO A THIRD-PARTY AGENT | SHAH, VAISHALI | 4d overdue |
| 19025826 | IMMUTABLE LOGGING OF ACCESS REQUESTS TO DISTRIBUTED FILE SYSTEMS | WRIGHT, BRYAN F | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2156 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19184069 | COMMUNICATING FINE-GRAINED APPLICATION DATABASE ACCESS TO A THIRD-PARTY AGENT | SHAH, VAISHALI | 2156 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 4d overdue | Pending | Apr 21, 2025 |
| 19025826 | IMMUTABLE LOGGING OF ACCESS REQUESTS TO DISTRIBUTED FILE SYSTEMS | WRIGHT, BRYAN F | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 16, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial