Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Altris AB maintains a company patent portfolio within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The data shows 1 pending office action currently under review. This prosecution is being conducted by 1 distinct examiner, which indicates a concentrated effort for the company. Furthermore, the activity is limited to 1 distinct art unit, suggesting a specific technical focus for the pending claims. This concentration allows a practitioner to focus on a single set of examiner guidelines and art unit practices rather than managing multiple disparate standards.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is DOVE, TRACY MAE. This examiner is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since the total number of pending office actions is 1, this examiner handles the entire active workload for the company. This means the outcome of the current prosecution depends on the decisions of this individual. Practitioners should note that there are no other pending office actions to provide a comparison of examiner behavior within this portfolio, which places a premium on the relationship with this specific official.
The presence of the distinct art unit for the distinct examiner confirms that the company's current patent office interactions are highly localized. This structure simplifies the management of the portfolio, as there is no need to coordinate between different examiners or art units. The workload is distributed such that DOVE, TRACY MAE manages the pending office action, representing the full scope of the company's current prosecution activity. This centralization provides a clear path for communication and a singular focus for the legal strategy.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DOVE, TRACY MAE | 1 | 68.7% | +9.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18701281 | A METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A SODIUM OR POTASSIUM ION BATTERY CELL | DOVE, TRACY MAE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1725 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18701281 | A METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A SODIUM OR POTASSIUM ION BATTERY CELL | DOVE, TRACY MAE | 1725 | §102§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 15, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialAltris AB has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Tracy Mae Dove has the most, with 1 of Altris AB's pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
