Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Alubaby Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, ATTEL, NINA KAY, who is the busiest examiner for the company with 1 pending action. The matter is being prosecuted within 1 distinct art unit, which indicates a focused area of technical review for the company's current filings.
The portfolio's current state of 1 pending office action suggests a limited or highly targeted prosecution phase. ATTEL, NINA KAY is the only examiner currently reviewing the company's work. Because the 1 pending office action is located in 1 distinct art unit, the company is dealing with a single point of contact and a specialized group within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering area. This centralized structure means the company's immediate patent outcomes depend on the evaluation of this 1 distinct examiner. Such a focused approach requires careful management of the relationship with the assigned examiner to ensure a successful outcome.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATTEL, NINA KAY | 1 | 41.5% | +28.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19214361 | SINGLE-USE MULTI-COMPARTMENT BABY FORMULA POUCH | ATTEL, NINA KAY | 30d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3734 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19214361 | SINGLE-USE MULTI-COMPARTMENT BABY FORMULA POUCH | ATTEL, NINA KAY | 3734 | §103 | Final Rejection | 30d overdue | Pending | May 21, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialAlubaby Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Nina Kay Attel has the most, with 1 of Alubaby Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
