Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Amanda H. Imamura maintains a patent portfolio currently featuring 1 pending office action. This activity is situated within the Chemistry & Materials technology area, reflecting the specific technical focus of the intellectual property. The prosecution is handled by 1 distinct examiner, which indicates a centralized review process for the pending matter. This structure provides a clear point of contact for the applicant during the examination phase.
The workload is distributed across 1 distinct art unit. GAITONDE, MEGHA MEHTA serves as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, accounting for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Since there is only 1 pending office action in total, this examiner is responsible for the full scope of the current prosecution efforts. The presence of 1 distinct art unit ensures that the technical evaluation remains within a specialized group at the office. This alignment helps in maintaining consistency in the technical arguments presented to the examiner throughout the process.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GAITONDE, MEGHA MEHTA | 1 | 40.5% | +35.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17790659 | HIGH-SURFACE AREA ELECTRODES FOR WEARABLE ELECTROCHEMICAL BIOSENSING | GAITONDE, MEGHA MEHTA | 121d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17790659 | HIGH-SURFACE AREA ELECTRODES FOR WEARABLE ELECTROCHEMICAL BIOSENSING | GAITONDE, MEGHA MEHTA | 121d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1781 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17790659 | HIGH-SURFACE AREA ELECTRODES FOR WEARABLE ELECTROCHEMICAL BIOSENSING | GAITONDE, MEGHA MEHTA | 1781 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 121d overdue | Pending | Jul 01, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial