Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Amcs Consulting LLC maintains a patent portfolio with 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This pending matter is being processed within 1 distinct art unit. The focus on this specific technology area indicates the technical nature of the company's current intellectual property pursuits and its reliance on mechanical engineering standards. This concentration in 1 distinct art unit suggests a very specific examination path for the company's current filing.
The prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner, ELOSHWAY, NIKI MARINA. As the busiest examiner for the company, ELOSHWAY, NIKI MARINA is handling 1 pending office action. This means that all current examiner-level communication for the portfolio is directed through this 1 person. The total current workload for the company's active prosecution is limited to this case, placing significant importance on the interaction with this 1 distinct examiner.
The data highlights a very focused prosecution stage, with 1 pending action and 1 distinct examiner. Practitioners should focus on the specific requirements of the 1 distinct art unit within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area to resolve the current pending matter. Success in this 1 case is the primary objective for the portfolio's current active status at the patent office.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ELOSHWAY, NIKI MARINA | 1 | 63.5% | +24.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18791714 | FLOATING GRID ARRANGEMENT TO SUPPORT AND POSITION DECORATIVE ELEMENTS | ELOSHWAY, NIKI MARINA | 162d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18791714 | FLOATING GRID ARRANGEMENT TO SUPPORT AND POSITION DECORATIVE ELEMENTS | ELOSHWAY, NIKI MARINA | 162d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3736 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18791714 | FLOATING GRID ARRANGEMENT TO SUPPORT AND POSITION DECORATIVE ELEMENTS | ELOSHWAY, NIKI MARINA | 3736 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 162d overdue | Pending | Aug 01, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial