Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

American Airlines Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

6 pending office actions • 5 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

American Airlines Inc. holds a patent portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. There are currently 6 pending office actions for the company. This reflects an active engagement with the patent office regarding their transportation and mechanical systems technologies.

The 6 pending office actions are assigned to 6 distinct examiners. These examiners work within 5 distinct art units. This distribution shows that while each action has a unique examiner, there is some overlap in the technical divisions, as 5 distinct art units are involved for the 6 actions.

ROBINSON, AKIBA KANELLE is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, with 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This 1 action is one of the 6 total pending office actions. Because there are 6 distinct examiners, the workload is spread, with no single examiner handling more than one of the 6 pending actions.

The presence of 5 distinct art units indicates that the company's filings span several specialized areas within the broader transportation technology sector. Practitioners should prepare for 6 different examiner interactions to resolve the 6 pending office actions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only3 (50%)
§101 + other3 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ROBINSON, AKIBA KANELLE 1 38.5% +24.4%
MOLNAR, HUNTER A 1 50.7% +33.1%
STIVALETTI, MATHEUS R 1 37.7% +26.0%
BROWN, SARA GRACE 1 28.8% +32.3%
CHOY, PAN G 1 24.5% +35.0%
ZEROUAL, OMAR 1 33.6% +39.6%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18789330 COMPUTER-BASED SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED AIRCRAFT CARGO LOAD PLANNING AND OPTIMAL SHIPPING CONFIGURATIONS MOLNAR, HUNTER A 8d overdue
17971272 RESOURCE ASSIGNMENTS BASED ON STATION CONSTRAINTS CHOY, PAN G 23d
16854673 UNOBSCURING ALGORITHM ZEROUAL, OMAR 40d
19204369 FARE CLASSES WITH OBSCURED DEMAND OR UNCONSTRAINED DEMAND ROBINSON, AKIBA KANELLE —
18535828 APPLYING LOGISTIC REGRESSION TO HISTORICAL DATA TO GENERATE FORECAST COEFFICIENTS STIVALETTI, MATHEUS R —
18481574 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING DISRUPTIONS WITHIN A TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM USING DELAYS AND CANCELLATIONS OF TRAVEL LEGS BROWN, SARA GRACE —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18789330 COMPUTER-BASED SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED AIRCRAFT CARGO LOAD PLANNING AND OPTIMAL SHIPPING CONFIGURATIONS MOLNAR, HUNTER A 8d overdue
17971272 RESOURCE ASSIGNMENTS BASED ON STATION CONSTRAINTS CHOY, PAN G 23d
16854673 UNOBSCURING ALGORITHM ZEROUAL, OMAR 40d
19204369 FARE CLASSES WITH OBSCURED DEMAND OR UNCONSTRAINED DEMAND ROBINSON, AKIBA KANELLE —
18535828 APPLYING LOGISTIC REGRESSION TO HISTORICAL DATA TO GENERATE FORECAST COEFFICIENTS STIVALETTI, MATHEUS R —
18481574 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING DISRUPTIONS WITHIN A TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM USING DELAYS AND CANCELLATIONS OF TRAVEL LEGS BROWN, SARA GRACE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3628 2
3626 1
3623 1
3625 1
3624 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19204369 FARE CLASSES WITH OBSCURED DEMAND OR UNCONSTRAINED DEMAND ROBINSON, AKIBA KANELLE 3626 §101§102§103 Final Rejection — Pending May 09, 2025
18789330 COMPUTER-BASED SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED AIRCRAFT CARGO LOAD PLANNING AND OPTIMAL SHIPPING CONFIGURATIONS MOLNAR, HUNTER A 3628 §101§103 Final Rejection 8d overdue Pending Jul 30, 2024
18535828 APPLYING LOGISTIC REGRESSION TO HISTORICAL DATA TO GENERATE FORECAST COEFFICIENTS STIVALETTI, MATHEUS R 3623 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 11, 2023
18481574 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING DISRUPTIONS WITHIN A TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM USING DELAYS AND CANCELLATIONS OF TRAVEL LEGS BROWN, SARA GRACE 3625 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 05, 2023
17971272 RESOURCE ASSIGNMENTS BASED ON STATION CONSTRAINTS CHOY, PAN G 3624 §101 Non-Final OA 23d Pending Oct 21, 2022
16854673 UNOBSCURING ALGORITHM ZEROUAL, OMAR 3628 §101§112 Final Rejection 40d Pending Apr 21, 2020

Managing American Airlines Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does American Airlines Inc. have?

American Airlines Inc. has 6 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 5 art units and 6 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most American Airlines Inc. applications?

Akiba Kanelle Robinson has the most, with 1 of American Airlines Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are American Airlines Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month