Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Ametrine Technologies Ltd.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Ametrine Technologies Ltd. currently has 2 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These 2 pending office actions are split between 2 distinct examiners. Both cases are located in 1 distinct art unit. PIZIALI, ANDREW T is the busiest examiner, handling 1 pending office action. This setup ensures that each of the 2 pending office actions is reviewed by a different examiner within the same technical group.

The concentration of 2 pending office actions in 1 distinct art unit suggests a specialized focus within Chemistry & Materials. While 2 distinct examiners are involved, the shared art unit environment may result in similar prosecution hurdles. PIZIALI, ANDREW T handles 1 pending office action, representing half of the current docket. Practitioners should coordinate responses to the 2 distinct examiners to maintain a unified strategy within the single art unit for both pending matters.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
0
Medium (0%)
2
Easy (100%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (50%)
Double-patenting only1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PIZIALI, ANDREW T 1 28.3% +27.3%
THOMPSON, CAMIE S 1 73.8% +10.4%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18811968 Multispectral Camouflage Material PIZIALI, ANDREW T —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18811968 Multispectral Camouflage Material PIZIALI, ANDREW T —
18746170 Multispectral Camouflage Material THOMPSON, CAMIE S —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1786 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18811968 Multispectral Camouflage Material PIZIALI, ANDREW T — §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 22, 2024
18746170 Multispectral Camouflage Material THOMPSON, CAMIE S 1786 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 18, 2024

Managing Ametrine Technologies Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month