Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Amita Technologies Inc. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This single active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, indicating a highly focused prosecution pipeline at this stage. The presence of this pending action suggests that the company's current engagement with the patent office is limited to a specific technical application rather than a broad portfolio of filings. Practitioners should note that the strategy is presently concentrated on a single technical thread, allowing for a deep but narrow legal approach to securing intellectual property rights.
The administrative footprint of the portfolio is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit, which centralizes the technical review process. LEONG, JONATHAN G serves as the busiest examiner for the company, currently handling 1 pending office action. Because this examiner is responsible for the assigned matter, they account for the total volume of the company's current office action responses. This alignment between the busiest examiner and the total workload reflects a consolidated examination environment where the prosecution strategy is tied to the findings of a single official. Such a structure requires the applicant to successfully navigate the specific preferences of one examiner to advance the portfolio.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEONG, JONATHAN G | 1 | 56.9% | +15.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18221851 | TEMPERATURE EQUALIZATION AND HEAT DISSIPATION STRUCTURE OF LITHIUM BATTERY | LEONG, JONATHAN G | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1751 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18221851 | TEMPERATURE EQUALIZATION AND HEAT DISSIPATION STRUCTURE OF LITHIUM BATTERY | LEONG, JONATHAN G | 1751 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 13, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial