Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Amo Development LLC

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 19 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (50%)
1
Easy (50%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (50%)
§112 only1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KAHELIN, MICHAEL WILLIAM 1 77.6% +24.0%
LEE, BRYAN MCALLISTER 1 93.3% +10.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18661507 MONITORING LASER-TISSUE INTERACTION DURING FEMTOSECOND LASER INCISION IN CORNEA USING BACK-REFLECTED TREATMENT LIGHT LEE, BRYAN MCALLISTER 12d

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18755600 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PERFORMING A POSTERIOR CAPSULOTOMY AND FOR LASER EYE SURGERY WITH A PENETRATED CORNEA KAHELIN, MICHAEL WILLIAM 9d overdue
18661507 MONITORING LASER-TISSUE INTERACTION DURING FEMTOSECOND LASER INCISION IN CORNEA USING BACK-REFLECTED TREATMENT LIGHT LEE, BRYAN MCALLISTER 12d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3792 1
3796 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18755600 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PERFORMING A POSTERIOR CAPSULOTOMY AND FOR LASER EYE SURGERY WITH A PENETRATED CORNEA KAHELIN, MICHAEL WILLIAM 3792 §112 Non-Final OA 9d overdue Pending Jun 26, 2024
18661507 MONITORING LASER-TISSUE INTERACTION DURING FEMTOSECOND LASER INCISION IN CORNEA USING BACK-REFLECTED TREATMENT LIGHT LEE, BRYAN MCALLISTER 3796 §102 Non-Final OA 12d Pending May 10, 2024

Managing Amo Development LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month